Looking for the Manx Cat

A Chase After a Symbolic Cat Which Appeared Briefly in Virginia Woolf’s A Room of One’s Own

Anyone that’s ever tried to catch a cat knows that they can be tricky creatures. Cats are beings of mischief. They are quick, and they are sly. They disappear into shadows and crannies like into fantastical rabbit holes. Furthermore, anyone who has ever spent an extended amount of time observing a cat might have noticed that they always give one the impression that they know something which no one else does. Perhaps it is the way that they blink at you, slow and steady like, completely self-satisfied in keeping their secrets to themselves. But, whatever may be said about the trickiness of realities cats, the cats which one meets in books are far trickier.

Anyone who’s ever encountered a fictional cat knows that, whatever it is that the cats of this world aren’t telling us, the fictional cat certainly won’t tell us either. Do not get me wrong, many fictional cats will swindle and tease you with their riddles, and I wouldn’t say that the fictional cat is a liar, but I don’t know if I’ve ever met a fictional cat that spoke a bland truth. In fact, I’m quite sure there wasn’t a single one of them that was not a riddler.

You’ve probably met the Cheshire Cat, and if you haven’t, I’m quite sure you’ve heard of him. But, if his reputation has somehow evaded you, I should explain that he is a most remarkable trickster. He knows more than he says, and yet never says what he knows. I could not name another who is quite so remarkable, though that has little to do with me not knowing of any others whose tricks and riddles exceed his and more to do with the fact that most other cats, at least the ones which I have encountered, do not have names.
The cat who appeared in Neil Gaiman’s Coraline certainly comes to mind, for he is the one that first remarked that cats do not need names simply because they have no use for them. He told me that “people have names… because you don’t know who you are. We know who we are, so we don’t need names”. And I must say, I quite agree with him.
The nameless cat in Peter S. Beagle’s The Last Unicorn is another trickster whose sole purpose is to confuse you. He, like the trickster from Gaiman’s Coraline, also fashionably neglected to introduce himself to me, saying only “I am what I am”, and “I would tell you what you want to know if I could… But I am a cat, and no cat anywhere ever gave anyone a straight answer”. 

It wasn’t until recently though that I encountered a more peculiar creature still; a creature that one might say is a riddle all on its own. Yes, fictional cats may be tricky, that much I know, but the symbolic cat might just be the trickiest trickster of them all.

The symbolic cat is in itself a peculiar creature, it is, as Virginia Woolf says, “quaint rather than beautiful” (A Room of One’s Own, 17). But what makes the symbolic cat so unusual is that we expect symbols to mean something. Yet I do not expect that I will decipher any meaning in our search for the Manx Cat. As I’ve already said, chasing a cat is tricky business. But chasing a symbolic cat may prove near impossible, for cats in books disappear between pages like cats in the real world disappear into shadows, and the Manx Cat has already managed to swindle us, for though he appeared briefly in the title of this essay, I have quite lost track of him since in my excursion after these other fictional tricksters, so let me get back to the point.

We are going to chase the Manx Cat. I first spotted him on page 15 of Virginia Woolf’s A Room of One’s Own, and so, if we are to find him, that is where we should begin. 

If I recall correctly, Virginia Woolf had just set the scene by remarking that “it is a curious fact that novelists have a way of making us believe that luncheon parties are invariably memorable for something very witty that was said,” (A Room of One’s Own, 13), which I find rather unusual, because the most curious event of this particular luncheon party was the arrival of the cat, (who did in fact not come to the luncheon party but stayed humbly outside on the lawn), and he didn’t say anything at all.
Woolf then goes on to mention all the things which novelists neglect to mention about the on-goings of luncheon parties, such as the soup and salmon that was eaten and the cigars that were smoked, as if this was of “no importance whatsoever” (A Room, 13). Indeed, the writers who failed to mention these details might not even have mentioned the uninvited guest who showed up outside the window.
Woolf had just remarked, most earnestly I’m sure, that all the members of the present luncheon party were going to heaven and exclaimed how right the world is with all its sweet rewards and trivial grudges and grievances and how admirable the friendship is between society and all of their kind (A Room, 14), when the uninvited guest makes his timely arrival.

Of course, the completely unimportant and previously unmentioned ashtray comes into play here, but had it not been there, had things, as Woolf says, “been a little different” she would never have spotted the tailless cat outside (A Room, 15)

He looks just as he did the last time I saw him here. Like before, he does not seem to notice his not having a tail, neither does he notice us watching him, though he is certainly aware of his having made his way once again into an essay, for there is an air of importance about him as he flicks his non-existent tail. Woolf watches him, and she cannot help but notice, as she did the last time, that “something seemed lacking, something seemed different” (A Room, 15).

In an effort to search for this missing thing, Woolf thinks “herself out of the room” (A Room, 15).  We follow her as she meanders through her thoughts into the past to another luncheon party which happened not so long ago. Though she remarks that at first glance everything about this luncheon party is different, everything is also very much the same (A Room, 15). The talk is the same, the room is the same. I imagine the attendees are eating soup and salmon and that the same ashtray sits idly on the coffee table waiting to be dumped.

Unfortunately, though, no one goes to dump the ash out of the window, and so, no matter how much we strain our necks, we will not be able to glance outside. We will never know whether or not there was a tailless cat outside the window. Though somehow, I have an inkling that the Manx Cat had little business there, for what could a tailless cat possibly want at a luncheon party that is so rich and nostalgic; a luncheon party in which nothing is lacking and men and woman hum love poems to each other. I think, if there was a cat outside this window, it probably had a tail.

I have not been to many luncheon parties and so I cannot be sure just how inappropriate Woolf’s random outburst of laughter was. But I cannot imagine that the other attendees understood the joke when Woolf, in an effort to explain her laughter, points at the Manx Cat outside. I must admit, I am not entirely sure I understand the joke myself.

The Manx Cat leaves soon after, for the luncheon party ends, and as it slips away, without so much as an exit, the only thing which we have left to ponder is how strange it is “what a difference a tail makes” (A Room, 17). Though it is rather puzzling that it should show up here, for Woolf does mention that the tailless cat is “rarer than one thinks” (A Room, 17), and so the odds of us sighting it again are rather low. 

The Manx Cat disappears for a long time after that. He might have appeared briefly on page 56 if only to look disapprovingly at the notion that anyone could lock a cat out of anywhere, even heaven.

I followed Virginia on her wanderings the last time I was here, and as I followed her, I kept my eyes open, watching ever for the Manx Cat. And, as I searched for the Manx Cat, Virginia searched high and low for her missing thing. She went searching in gardens and libraries and museums; she searched through the centuries of time, through natural histories and whimsical ones; she searched through the scope of a looking glass and at the point of her pencil; she peered into secluded rooms and wandered empty streets and graveyards, all in search of a flicker of a shadow; a shadow that looks somehow very much like the queer form of a cat.

Eventually, she does what any intelligent person would do when looking for a lost symbolic thing, like a missing cat that never was and may never be again; she goes to the library and, picking up books that aren’t there, she looks for things that are missing. Leafing through these imaginary books, she turns “page after page…feeling that a crisis was approaching” (A Room, 118).

The crisis comes in the form of two people on a beach, a man and a woman who walk towards each other under the sun. In the fanciful world they may have been named Phoebe and Alan. In a more nostalgic world they may have been two poets named Alfred Lord Tennyson and Christina Rossetti. Whatever their names were, we will never know for certain because neither of them bothers to introduce themselves; in fact, neither of them says a word. But the Manx Cat greets you with the nod of his head, for he too sits there on the beach, and he turns to you grinning, very much the image of the Cheshire Cat. And although he does not speak, there is something in his grin that suggests a remark, a sly whisper perhaps –something like “Hello, I am the Manx Cat.”

But, on second thought, I cannot be too sure that that is what the Manx Cat would have said. For as the two people part ways without so much as a goodbye, and their obstructive shadows form into blockades, the Manx Cat blinks its cunning eye, and I could have sworn I might have heard him whisper something like… “Hello reader, I am something missing. I am something wrong.”

But then again, I cannot be sure, for the waves were crashing and the gulls were calling, and the pages flipped, and then the cat was gone.

As I walked along the beach nearing the end of the essay and heard the traffic roar, as Mary Beton ceased to speak, and the sun on the beach peered into the common sitting room, all I was left with was the shadow of a notion that, if I were to write an essay about women and fiction, I would go to another luncheon party. I would look out of the window, and I would not see so much as the solitary shadow of a cat. But there, out on the lawn where the ashes have blown, a cat’s tail hangs from a tree or a hedge, ragged and battered by the wind. But where the cat went, I wouldn’t know.

How We Tried to Keep the Moon

The day we found out the moon was leaving the world looked to the sky.
Even though we were told the moon was disappearing, we suddenly saw it everywhere. It was on posters, in the papers, and on television channels. The headlines were inescapable: Moon Leaving Earth’s Orbit. Newsagents shouted it in the streets and you’d overhear it in passing conversations. We didn’t know when or why the moon was leaving us. We would look out of our windows and there she’d be, in the sky where she’d always been, seemingly unaware that she had become the novelty of the decade. She was the headliner, the main attraction, the newest thing, and yet, to the naked eye she hadn’t changed at all. The moon looked the same as it always had.
Yet on earth, the prices of telescopes quickly went up. People climbed mountains and towers to get a closer look at her, almost as if we thought we could witness her departure. We became a society of moon-gazers. But, as day by day we watched her from our rooftops, nothing seemed to change. The moon waxed, and she waned, but she had always done that. The uproar died down eventually, and soon everything returned to normal.
Until the day an Italian philosopher rowed out to sea. He said afterwards that the easiest way to follow the moon is by boat, for nowhere does she seem closer than out upon the waters. He was the first to notice that the moon had shrunken.
Of course, no one could prove it. The mathematicians and the astronomers did their calculations, yet their math could not convince them. Across the nations, people raised their thumbs to the night sky. The moon had shrunken, and nothing could convince them otherwise. 
So, it was that the world became obsessed with the moon. It was as if now that we knew that she was leaving the world had rediscovered her vitality to the sky; almost as though we had forgotten that she had been there all along.
Never-the-less, the world came together; scientists, inventors, scholars, explorers, and philosophers; masterminds and visionaries of all sorts band-together with but one ambition: to figure out how to convince the moon to stay.

The first to attempt it was a Russian physicist who believed that the best way to retrieve the moon was by strengthening the earth’s gravitational pull. Rumors circulated about the possibilities of magnetic power. A couple of documentaries were filmed and for a time this convinced the people that the problem would be solved.
But, as more and more moon-gazers took to the sea, people quickly became aware that the ocean’s tides were falling. Things only got worse after that.

The next to hit the headlines was a French inventor. Sketches of blueprints were released of a preposterous contraption designed to reel the moon back into the earth’s orbit. A commotion of stories followed.
Though word of the French inventor soon disappeared, extremists and enthusiasts of all sorts endeavored to construct the Frenchmen’s invention. Technicians, Architects and Carpenters attempted to build the device. Everyone wanted to be remembered as the person who had saved the moon.
For a while, this society of innovators took over the news. Stories were heard of people climbing the Eiffel Tower in an attempt to lass the moon. But, as the stories became more and more absurd, the Frenchmen’s scandal was soon forgotten.
The world continued as normal for a time. But the story of the moon’s flight soon resurfaced when a German Astro-photographer snapped a shot of her in her full form, a photograph which he claimed was proof of her departure.
Once again, the moon seemed to have shrunken right before our eyes.

Scientists no longer tried to disprove that the moon was leaving after that, though whether that was because the Astro-Photographer’s photograph had convinced them or whether they had decided it was best to ignore the upheaval no one really knew.
But, as the scientists stepped away, the artists took over. A sensation of works followed of which the moon was the latest inspiration. She became a prodigy, a monument of art.
The first to captivate the audiences with their moon-work spectacle was an English playwright who had written a play about a poet who built a ladder atop mount Everest and used it to climb to the moon.
Not long after, circuses started advertising acrobats who could swing into the night sky and funambulists who slung lines to the moon. Dancers waltzed on the moon and artists painted her. A composer released a rhapsody of lullabies inspired by her. Sonnets and nursery rhymes were written. Filmmakers released features about her, and a Spanish chef created a concoction known as moon-cheese.
But the funny thing is, in all the hustling and bustling, people stopped looking at the moon again. She was still there for all to see, yet people were too busy to notice her.
The last piece of moon-art I ever saw was a mural painted on the side of an observatory depicting the moon breaking free from its bounds of nooses and chains and forces of magnetic power. Under it was written in broad letters Free the Moon.
The moon never did end of leaving, and yet, somehow, we lost her still. Though the mural was painted over a few days later, I can still see visibly in my mind’s eye the image of the moon drifting off into space like a great balloon, finally liberated from her shackles. Sometimes when the moon peeks into my bedroom window late in the evening I cannot help but wonder why it is that she decided to stay.

A Day in London Below

I stopped to take this picture while I was reading Neil Gaiman's Neverwhere.

It was a cool and cloudy day and I could hear the stream outside my window rushing. I lit my Rainy Day Reads candle and read the day away.

I had my second cup of coffee sitting on my nightstand, and by the time I remembered to drink it, it was already cold. My brother always says I have a habit of leaving my coffee unfinished. But I blame the book for that one. I have always been fascinated by Gaiman's imagination. But this book! My, was it ever beguiling!